Fabricated Evidence
Dr. Robert Leonard has served as an expert for the FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit, DOJ, JTTF, British intelligence agencies, and the Prime Minister of Canada. He serves as Senior Consultant to the IARPA Linguistic Fingerprint Project of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and has qualified as expert witness in 15 States and 11 Federal Districts. Dr. Leonard was retained to conduct forensic analysis on the journals that were read aloud in the Netflix “True Crime” film, Orgasm Inc.: The Story of OneTaste and produced in civil discovery, against a large volume of known original writings of Blanck from an online social network. The following represents quotes attributable to Dr. Leopard taken from interviews as well as his 123-page analysis of the journals by comparing known original writings of Blanck from an online social network and comparing those writings to the journal writing:
MEMO ON DR. ROBERT LEONARD
FORENSIC LINGUIST ANALYSIS
Dr. Leonard’s summary statements:
“We have this alleged journal from the Netflix movie that is said to have been written by someone. Then we have all the original writings of who it was said to be written by. The patterns absolutely don’t match.
Dr. Leonard’s summary statements:
“In other cases I have worked on that have been successful, there were far fewer differences in writing features. The differences in features here are simply overwhelming.”
Dr. Leonard’s summary statements:
“If Netflix had come to me and said these writings are purported to have been written by Ayries and asked me what does the evidence suggest, I would have told them to be very careful.”
“The journals were written by a very skilled writer.”
“A writing “feature” is a scientific term used by forensic linguistics to represent a particular style of language use. Any particular individual’s style of writing can be categorized by the collection of “features” used by that author. The science of forensic linguist analysis involves identifying repeated “features” of one writing sample, and comparing the features in another writing sample, as a method for evaluating consistent authorship. Strong similarities in writing “features” between two writing samples indicate the same author, while strong differences or a high number of differences in “features” between two writing samples indicates different authors.”
— Dr. Robert A Leonard
Example feature differences between Ayries' authentic writing and the "journals":
One linguistic feature that stands out as clearly differentiating the Q Journal from K Ayries (her authenticated writings) is the idiosyncratic contraction “I’de”.
K Ayries (original writings) uses “I’de” or “ide” for the contracted form of “I would”.
The Q Journal only has the standard contracted form “I’d” – never that particular variation of “Ide”/”i’de”.
Some examples are:
“I’de take a good hard look at what you are supporting in this world”
“I’de be seen as a compassionate loving person because I meditate”
“and ide say society at large.”
“This is something that any lay person can see as idiosyncratic, and regular. So, why doesn’t the Q have it? Maybe because it was written by someone else, or, perhaps edited/rewritten by someone else.”
The Motion
Read the most recent court filing. Click here.